The store will not work correctly when cookies are disabled.
We use cookies to make your experience better.
To comply with the e-Privacy rules, we need to ask for your consent to use non-essential cookies (such as analytics and marketing). You can allow or decline these cookies. Essential cookies (for things like basket and checkout) will always be used. For more details, please see our Privacy Policy.
The story of Crispus Attucks, the escaped slave who became the first person to die for American independence...
Black Crispus Attucks taught Us how to die Before white Patrick Henry’s bugle breath Uttered the Vertical Transmitting cry: "Yea, give me liberty or give me death."
- Melvin Tolson, “Dark Symphony”
The first person to die for American independence was a mixed-race sailor and escaped slave called Crispus Attucks.
On this day in 1770, he was the first American protestor shot dead by British soldiers at the Boston Massacre.
Phillis Wheatley, a slave poet living in Boston, wrote a poem commemorating Crispus Attucks and all those killed in the Boston Massacre on 5 March
Attucks’ story, as a Black Patriot, goes to the heart of the tensions in the American Revolution – and in the American Republic created by it.
Born in Framingham, Massachusetts, in or around 1723, Crispus Attucks was a mixed-race African American and indigenous man.
He seems to have been enslaved but escaped, often going by the alias ‘Michael Johnson’ to avoid recapture.
By the 1760s, when the Thirteen Colonies had become discontent with Britain over commercial restrictions and other new regulations, Crispus Attucks was working as a merchant sailor on the Atlantic seaboard routes of British North America.
Maritime life in the eighteenth-century was a space of radical politics, and sailors were an important agent of rebellion and revolution.
At their most politically creative, merchant ships became ‘floating republics’ where cross-racial solidarity and egalitarianism were the norm.
And radical shipboard politics left its mark on the port cities of the Atlantic where sailors came ashore. Port cities like Boston…
To many African-American writers, including W.E.B. Du Bois, the United States never truly lived up to the ideals of equality and freedom proclaimed by the Founding Fathers
In March 1770, Crispus Attucks was in town after a voyage to the Bahamas, waiting to set sail again on the route down to North Carolina.
But Boston was about to explode.
Since 1768, British regulars had been deployed in the town to control protests against the Stamp Act and other new taxes intended to pay for the British Army in North America.
Soon enough, the relationship between Boston citizens and British soldiers was at boiling point.
It all kicked off on 5 March 1770, when a Boston wigmaker accused a British army officer of not paying his bill.
The row escalated into a wider standoff between nine soldiers and a growing crowd of citizens at the Old State House.
Crispus Attucks and a group of Americans were there with clubs, to confront the army or protect the protestors.
Words were exchanged and snowballs were thrown at the soldiers until, as often happens to men with guns in stressful situations, one of them decided to open fire, then the rest did too.
This nineteenth-century lithograph of the Boston Massacre commemorates the death of Crispus Attucks, who had become an important symbol for abolitionists
Five protestors were shot dead, the first of them Crispus Attucks.
And although the people at the Old State House might not have known it at the time, they’d just seen the start of the American Revolution.
True, it was another five years until the Battles of Lexington and Concord launched the War of Independence proper.
But the Boston Massacre of March 1770 was a watershed moment, when the dispute between American colonists and Britain first slipped into open violence.
That makes Crispus Attucks – a Black indigenous man from New England – the first fatality of the American Revolution.
It’s a fact that cuts to the heart of American independence and its contradictions, as both a war of liberation and a war of conquest led by a slaveholding elite.
Alongside the motivating ideas of liberty and equality, the white men who led the Revolution also wanted to end British restrictions on the further conquest of Native American land.
And many of the Founding Fathers were also nervous about British calls to abolish slavery, and how they might spread to North America.
This is why so many Native American tribes and enslaved people, unlike Crispus Attucks, decided to ally with the British Army.
For some enslaved and conquered people in North America, the Revolution looked like an opportunity. But for others, it threatened more oppression, not less.
Frederick Douglass called out American hypocrisy in a famous speech on the 4th of July, 1852, and refused to celebrate the Fourth of July holiday until all slaves were emancipated
These tensions continued to play out in the memory politics of the American Revolution during the next two centuries.
Because of the Revolution’s acceptance of slavery, nineteenth-century abolitionists questioned its legacy.
Frederick Douglass famously asked “what to the slave is the Fourth of July?”
But others tried to reclaim American independence as a multiracial project whose unfinished promise included abolition, and they did so by recovering the stories of Patriots like Crispus Attucks.
During the nineteenth century, abolitionists and civil rights activists in Boston campaigned to memorialise Attucks, creating a ‘Crispus Attucks Day’ in 1858 and making sure he was included in the 1888 monument to the Boston Massacre.
Meanwhile, racist groups committed to a fictional all-white Revolution tried to stop them.
In the memory battle, the radicals won – Attucks is commemorated in Boston. But the contest over the meanings, legacy, and future of the American Revolution continues.
Crispus Attucks doesn’t just represent the beginning of the American Revolution, he represents the ongoing struggle for its soul.
Who were our radical ancestors? What's the legacy we're following? To understand the present, we have to look back at our past, and that's exactly what Pete's radical history emails and blog posts do.
With so many remarkable individuals, It's impossible for Pete to choose his favourite figure from radical history, but if he had to, he'd say Sylvia Pankhurst: "She always appreciated that the struggles for feminist, economic, and racial emancipation are linked together, and she did all of her politics with that truth in mind. Also, like me, she's a Mancunian!"